In-Print Update
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Bob">mailto%3Abneubauer@napco.com">Bob<%2Fa>%20Neubauer%20It's%20hard%20to%20believe,%20but%20this%20was%20the%20seventh%20year%20I%20coordinated%20the%20judging%20of%20the%20In-Print%20contest.%20In%20all%20that%20time%20I've%20seen%20a%20lot%20of%20good-quality%20in-plant%20work%20pass%20through%20my%20office.%20And%20all%20I%20can%20say%20is,%20I'm%20glad%20I%20don't%20have%20to%20judge%20it.%20This%20year%20we%20had%20an%20almost%20entirely%20new%20crew%20doing%20the%20judging,%20and%20I%20think%20they%20were%20in%20a%20state%20of%20shock%20once%20they%20realized%20the%20difficulty%20of%20the%20task%20they%20had%20signed%20up%20for.%20Because%20it's%20hard—really,%20really%20hard—to%20pick%20winners%20when%20the%20work%20is%20so%20good.%20Hey,%20wipe%20that%20proud%0D%0A%0D%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.inplantimpressions.com%2Farticle%2Fin-print-update-13913%2F" target="_blank" class="email" data-post-id="7090" type="icon_link">
Email
Email
0 Comments
Comments
I know why it turned out that way. People looked at all the items they produced, and the offset items looked much better so they entered them, overlooking their nice color copier jobs.
Truth is, the competition is much more fierce in those offset categories. Many excellent items don't win prizes. When the quality is equally good, judges look at other factors, like degree of difficulty.
0 Comments
View Comments
- People:
- Bob Neubauer
Related Content
Comments