In-Print Update
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Bob">mailto%3Abneubauer@napco.com">Bob<%2Fa>%20Neubauer%20It's%20hard%20to%20believe,%20but%20this%20was%20the%20seventh%20year%20I%20coordinated%20the%20judging%20of%20the%20In-Print%20contest.%20In%20all%20that%20time%20I've%20seen%20a%20lot%20of%20good-quality%20in-plant%20work%20pass%20through%20my%20office.%20And%20all%20I%20can%20say%20is,%20I'm%20glad%20I%20don't%20have%20to%20judge%20it.%20This%20year%20we%20had%20an%20almost%20entirely%20new%20crew%20doing%20the%20judging,%20and%20I%20think%20they%20were%20in%20a%20state%20of%20shock%20once%20they%20realized%20the%20difficulty%20of%20the%20task%20they%20had%20signed%20up%20for.%20Because%20it's%20hard—really,%20really%20hard—to%20pick%20winners%20when%20the%20work%20is%20so%20good.%20Hey,%20wipe%20that%20proud%0D%0A%0D%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.inplantimpressions.com%2Farticle%2Fin-print-update-13913%2F" target="_blank" class="email" data-post-id="7090" type="icon_link">
Email
Email
0 Comments
Comments
Hey, wipe that proud grin off your face. Not everyone's entries were perfect. A lot of otherwise great work was marred with dropouts, roller marks, uneven folds or misaligned crossovers. I mention this so that perhaps next year you'll find these flaws before our judges do.
Want more insight? O.K., entries with multiple parts, say stationery submitted with a matching envelope and business card, have a greater chance of being eliminated (multiple parts = multiple chances for flaws).
0 Comments
View Comments
- People:
- Bob Neubauer
Related Content
Comments