From the Editor: Triumph in Tennessee
It was exactly a year ago that the drama began for Jack Williams. That's when the board of trustees at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, issued a directive to begin soliciting proposals from outside vendors for the possible outsourcing of his Graphic Arts Services operation.
This was kind of a low blow for such a well-run, well-equipped in-plant, which has long served as a model for other in-plants. Directed for more than three decades by the much admired Gary Williford, who turned over the reigns to Williams' competent hands about five years ago, the in-plant is proficient in both offset and digital printing. The centerpiece is its four-color Heidelberg Speedmaster XL 105, backed up by a pair of two-color Heidelberg Printmasters. The in-plant's Kodak NexPress 2500, along with a NexGlosser glossing unit, produce the high-quality, personalized recruitment materials that entice students to "Go Big Orange."
As most of us know, though, proficiency, service, savings and all the other benefits an in-plant provides are not always enough to ensure its survival when a new president arrives, itching to make changes, or when the in-plant occupies prime real estate that the organization wants to repurpose. In UT's case, Williams says, it was an "efficiency and effectiveness committee" set up by the board of trustees to analyze all of the university's service operations, to see if there was a better way of doing things.
"It was quite a surprise to me at the time because we'd just gone through a departmental review," remarks Williams. "The report came back positive on that. But I guess that didn't have enough impact."
What followed was a year of uncertainty for the print and mail operation and its 44 employees. Williams was on the committee evaluating proposals, so he kept staff informed. He says he was very pleased with them for continuing to work hard and provide excellent service despite the stress.
In the end, only two vendors offered bids. The in-plant's costs were lower. Last month, a decision was made. The in-plant would stay.
Elated over this victory, Williams credits the shop's experienced staff, high-quality output, excellent service and the fact that it has been showing a profit. It also helped that the in-plant received tons of customer support.
"A lot of our customers sent messages of support to the upper level administration," Williams says. These endorsements made decision makers more keenly aware of the level of service and quality the in-plant provides.
Williams is already making plans to move the in-plant forward. He has submitted a five-year plan, which includes equipment upgrades, like processless CTP and a coil binder, and is making some much needed hiring and staff reorganization decisions, after a year in limbo.
"It has been a challenging year," Williams remarks, "and I am pleased that we can now get back to focusing on providing these services to the university and continue to be efficient and effective."
Bob has served as editor of In-plant Impressions since October of 1994. Prior to that he served for three years as managing editor of Printing Impressions, a commercial printing publication. Mr. Neubauer is very active in the U.S. in-plant industry. He attends all the major in-plant conferences and has visited more than 180 in-plant operations around the world. He has given presentations to numerous in-plant groups in the U.S., Canada and Australia, including the Association of College and University Printers and the In-plant Printing and Mailing Association. He also coordinates the annual In-Print contest, co-sponsored by IPMA and In-plant Impressions.
